On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 09:26 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:15:07AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > >>> It's possible that one of the flushing patches is to blame; I just > >>> can't > >>> see how. Most likely is > >>> > >>> commit d7dd2ff11b7fcd425aca5a875983c862d19a67ae > >>> Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Date: Thu Apr 14 18:25:21 2011 -0500 > >>> > >>> [PARISC] only make executable areas executable > >>> > >> > >> This looks promising, the second commit doesn't touch the flush_*_local, > >> so I think it's probably not a candidate. > >> > >> Rolf, can you revert d7dd2ff11b7fcd425aca5a875983c862d19a67ae and see > >> what happens? > > > > What happens is that the system boots and from a first glance seems to > > work fine. > > James, are you going to revert that commit? Or am I the only one that is > seeing this? You're the only one whose seeing this. It works 32 bit on my C360, so I really need to know why and I don't seem to have a means to debug if it's C3600 only. If I revert that commit, we start segfaulting again. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
