On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 22:36 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 22:18, James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These two fixes contain the agreed fix for our slub panic (agreed with > > the mm folks that we'll define SLUB broken in the !NUMA && DISCONTIGMEM > > case, which should fix m86k as well) and another buglet that turned up > > examining the parisc discontigmem code. > > Do we still need to mark SLUB broken? > On m68k, the issue seems to have been fixed by setting the N_NORMAL_MEMORY flag > (pull request scheduled after one more linux-next build cycle). > > Or do you plan to unmark it broken once every affected arch sets the > N_NORMAL_MEMORY flag? Yes ... simply doing N_NORMAL_MEMORY doesn't fix parisc to not oops. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
