On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:34:23AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > That part makes me think the best option is to make parisc do > CONFIG_NUMA as well regardless of the historical intent was. But it's not just parisc. It's six other architectures as well, some of which aren't even SMP. Does !SMP && NUMA make any kind of sense? I think really, this is just a giant horrible misunderstanding on the part of the MM people. There's no reason why an ARM chip with 16MB of memory at 0 and 16MB of memory at 1GB should be saddled with all the NUMA gunk. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
