On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:11:23AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > IIUC SOCK_CLOEXEC only works in 2.6.27 or higher with accept4? > > In which case, since accept4 has never existed before, it's OK to > change this value? > Well, it's never worked either, so I assume it's safe to change. The main problem is glibc keeping a parallel copy of the system headers instead of using the sanitized ones, since this means anything which correctly used those headers has the right value. (Basically... any userspace program compiled against the old glibc will need to be rebuilt, but if we change it won't be any more broken than they already have been.) regards, Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
