Re: Changes to fcntl.h and F_* numbers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 12:00 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> Kyle, Helge,
> >>
> >> I've seen some recent churn regarding the kernel fcntl.h and F_* numbers.
> >>
> >> If our numbers change please keep me in the loop so I can update the C
> >> library side.
> >>
> >
> > ?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-api&m=125688056905828&w=2

But this isn't parisc specific ... it's a bug CodeSourcery reported in
the ABI assignment in asm-generic.

We already look to have this sorted out locally in our fcntl.h ... so
we're not going to be changing anything, are we?  Or are you saying
(because we could get into trouble in future) that we should adopt the
asm generic ones?

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux