On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:50:23AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote: >> Looks like you did some good sleuthing... Although... I notice that >> ia64 doesn't seem to bother to do this sanity check on the unwind table. >> >> tausq, should we just drop it in ours too? I can't see any evidence ia64 >> does anything differently in bfd that would circumvent this kind of >> issue. > > IIRC we do a binary search for the unwind entry. If the entries are not > sorted, the binary search will give wrong results. > Indeed, would be interesting to add this sanity check to ia64 and see what happens. regards, Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
