On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Mike Frysinger<vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 07 September 2009 17:54:01 Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> The following patches implement version 2 of the NPTL upgrade for >> hppa. This second version is a rewrite of internal pthread structures >> and is 100% ABI backwards compatible. All old applications will run >> with the new glibc, including during partial upgrades. >> >> I have tested the following patches with eglibc_2.10.1-0exp1, the >> testing has included the standard glibc regression testing, simulation >> of partial upgrades, and heavy chroot testing with Xnest, and several >> large multithreaded UI applications (evince, xchat, nautilus, >> gnome-session etc). All tests succeeded. >> >> * Please add the following patch to the hppa set of patches: >> http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/debian-final_glibc-ports-hppa-nptl.diff > > any reason for not pushing this (and all the other hppa patches) to the glibc > ports tree ? it isnt like you'll be breaking anything that isnt already > broken, and it'll make it easier for people to play with mainline glibc. It would have been upstream *before* the email went out, but my git-fu is incredibly weak. I've been talking to Roland about my problems with pushing upstream (and the accidental branch I created on glibc.git). git push -v Pushing to git://sourceware.org/git/glibc-ports.git fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly git remote show origin * remote origin URL: git://sourceware.org/git/glibc-ports.git HEAD branch: master ... Local branch configured for 'git pull': master merges with remote master Local ref configured for 'git push': master pushes to master (fast forwardable) I don't know what's wrong here. AFAICT it should just work, I've been using `git pull --rebase` to keep my repo updated. Cheers, Carlos. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
