On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarno<aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Frans Pop a écrit : >> Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>>> In practice it shouldn't be problem at all. >>>> Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled >>>> against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc >>>> by proper Depends: line like "libc6 (>= 2.10)". >>> Does every package have to do this? I'm not very familiar with all the >>> packaging requirements. >> >> It is something that should automatically get done correctly as long as >> the libc-dev package defines the minimum version that way. >> >> The mechanism that determines this is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs. >> Currently this has lines like: >> libc 6 libc6 (>= 2.9) >> > > No, as glibc uses symbols files, this file is actually not used. > Nevertheless it is still possible to resolve all symbols to libc6 (>= 2.10). Once an application is rebuilt against a new libc, what prevents the user from downgrading libc and breaking the application? Cheers, Carlos. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
