On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:19:36 am James Bottomley wrote: > The root cause is a duplicate section name (.text); is this legal? I'd be happy to fail to load it. There might be sysfs issues with it too. > However, there's a problem with commit > 6d76013381ed28979cd122eb4b249a88b5e384fa in that if you fail to allocate > a mod->sect_attrs (in this case it's null because of the duplication), > it still gets used without checking in add_notes_attrs() > > This should fix it No, the real problem is that it ignores failure. I'd much rather fail the module load than various features mysteriously MIA. Which brings us to "patches which don't go thru the maintainer" (or perhaps, non-responsive maintainers who get bypassed). Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
