On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:57:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > Hang on a minute, this is an untested patch. True, it will likely cause > no harm, but it would be more usual to wait for the actual confirmation > before declaring the problem fixed. > I'd be shocked if anyone was actually in a position to test this at all... I don't remember where I put my last Mongoose and HP VG ethernet card... It looked fine to me though. > I'm also very concerned about this: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/2/107 > > That's a breach of standard maintainer protocol since you failed to copy > the architecture list on the pull request. > > Parisc is in a precarious position as a marginal architecture that isn't > being produced any more. Having duelling trees and maintainers is > definitely very unhelpful because it could cause Linus to lose > confidence in our ability as a community. > > First things first, you need to agree on a single tree ... although it's > perfectly possible to have multiple maintainers commit to it (x86 works > this way), can we do this at least before the schizophrenia gets > noticed? > I think Helge was just upset that I wasn't merging things fast enough, and, fair enough, I guess. I promise to rectify that, and if I don't, I plan to step aside. regards, Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
