Hello all, Everybody is talking about the 'random crashes' and 'segfaults' in the HPPA version. Over here I'm using the hppa on a small HP-UX workstation, and that has an uptime of 542 days!. So it's not that unstable. I even need to say that I had a lot more crashes with the x86 version then with the hppa version. Just to say that I'm personally not so unhappy with deb hppa, and that not everything is bad. B > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Luk Claes <luk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The main problem we have with hppa is that important porter issues are >> not dealt with in a reasonable time frame. The random crashes and >> segfaults are lasting for years already! >> >> Note that we do *NOT* intend to drop hppa from unstable, it being >> mentioned at all was an unfortunate sign of the deep frustration of some... >> > > -- > Schelstraete Bart > http://www.schelstraete.org > bart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent from Brussels, Brx, Belgium > Mae West - "I like restraint, if it doesn't go too far." -- Schelstraete Bart http://www.schelstraete.org bart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent from Brussels, Brx, Belgium Erma Bombeck - "Never have more children than you have car windows." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
