On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:43:48 Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:34:59PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > Hi Kyle, > > > > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 07:09:59PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > > > > If you strace it, what syscall returns -EOPNOTSUPP? > > > > > > > > strace is broken and quits before the relevant syscall. Think I > > > > mentioned this before is a different context. > > > > > > Fixed & updated strace available at > > > http://people.debian.org/~kyle/strace/ > > > > strace is either broken again or debian didn't pick up your fix. The > > link to your updated version is broken. > > > > This happens when tracing sshd during a connection attempt with -f > > option: > > > > strace -f -p 2390 > > Process 2390 attached - interrupt to quit > > _newselect(7, [3 4], NULL, NULL, NULL > > ... > > [pid 5627] open("/etc/selinux/config", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT > > (No such file or directory) upeek: > > ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER,5627,4294967292,0): Input/output error Process > > 5627 detached > > <... _newselect resumed> ) = 1 (in [6]) > > > > Trying to figure out why sshd sometimes does wierd stuff. > > I'll take a look, the strace link is broken because sadly the debian > people didn't migrate the entirety of the people machine when they > brought in a new one. if said fix could actually get posted to the strace devel list at sf.net, that'd be even better ... probably related: http://bugs.gentoo.org/250631 -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
