On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:44:17PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:21 -0700, Matt Carlson wrote: > > James, Robin. I looked through the patches again and found that the > > SEEPROM routines were not being adjusted correctly along with the flash > > NVRAM access routines. The patch below should shore up the difference. > > The patch works on both BE and LE systems. > > > > Can you apply the patch below and see if it fixes your problem? (You > > may have to back out David's changes for the mac addresses to be > > restored, but 'eeprom -e' dumps should be fixed.) If it does, I'll > > post a replacement patch that documents why the code is doing what it's > > doing. > > Yes, that seems to work better: both the mac address and ethtool -e > output are back to what 2.6.29 reports. Works for me as well. Thanks, Robin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
