On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 17:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > > It isn't wise to use the struct device klists on their own, as their > implementation has a tendancy to change at times. Instead, use the > functions created for iterating over lists of devices, as it handles all > of the dirty klist work for you automatically. > > This is needed as the driver core is changing how klists are stored in > struct device in the near future. > > Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> > Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > I can keep this in my driver-core tree, where is it required in order > for parisc to build properly. Or you all can take this now, in your > tree, whatever is easier for you. > > drivers/char/agp/parisc-agp.c | 24 ++++++--------- > drivers/parisc/gsc.c | 40 +++++++++++++++----------- > drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) Actually, we already have such a patch here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-parisc&m=123154903507114 The approaches look identical. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
