* Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 22 September 2008 20:24:04 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6.27-rc7.orig/arch/ia64/include/asm/siginfo.h > > > +++ linux-2.6.27-rc7/arch/ia64/include/asm/siginfo.h > > > > please do not send patches that modify include/asm/ files, the > > include/asm-x86/ file should be modified instead. > > > > (this problem will go away in v2.6.28 when we'll move include/asm-x86/ > > to arch/x86/include/) > > > > Ingo, Sorry if I have confused you. [...] hah, indeed - i mis-read them as include/asm/. > Currently a SIGTRAP can denote any one of below reasons. > - Breakpoint hit > - H/W debug register hit > - Single step > - Signal sent through kill() or rasie() > > Architectures like powerpc/parisc provides infrastructure to > demultiplex SIGTRAP signal by passing down the information for > receiving SIGTRAP through si_code of siginfot_t structure. Here is an > attempt is generalise this infrastructure by extending it to x86 and > x86_64 archs. applied to [the new topic] tip/core/signal, thanks Srinivasa! There are some other pending x86 signal changes already, so i based tip/core/signal on tip/x86/signal. Roland, any opinion on this change? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
