On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:12:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:48:35PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > They certainly have to be inessential to the parisc ABI ... they don't > > > work if anything's actually trying to use them. > > Really? Which sort of "don't work" is this? Why should a I2C rtc device > > (some dallas chip) not work? > Um, because the architecture doesn't have an i2c bus. Well, it have USB, so can also power usb-to-i2c adapters. And there is even the rtc test module. Which "don't work" do you refer to? - Does not work because there is no binding to the hardware. - Does not work because a fundamental problem in the whole subsystem. (- Does not work because ...) Bastian -- You're dead, Jim. -- McCoy, "The Tholian Web", stardate unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
