> This should probably get a little review from Rland, I've added him to > the Cc list. Although I suspect splitting this into at least two > patches for compat_sys_ptrace vs the rest might make sense. For the machines where I've done this work, I've certainly been well-served by breaking it into many smaller incremental patches. That would make the meat of each patch far easier to read than this one big patch is. It seems odd to have user_disable_single_step call ptrace_disable rather than vice versa. Otherwise, off hand I don't see anything particularly suspect in the patch, but I'll admit I didn't look too close because the one big diff is a pain to read. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
