> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote: > > So, I still think it would be better to remove the .align16, or > > alternatively to move it in front of ENTRY(lws_lock_start) [to be on the > > safe side]. > > > > Am I really that wrong? > > No, you are absolutely right. I forgot the locks are referenced via > lws_lock_start, and the symbol needs to be aligned. Sorry, I thought > there was another symbol elsewhere. This would be clearer if there was an ENTRY_ALIGNED macro (e.g., ENTRY_ALIGNED(lws_lock_start, 16)). It's probably overkill though. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
