Hi, On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:08:30PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c > index b69dd9a..f97b34b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c > @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > > if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) { > if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) { > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); don't you have to disable pm_runtime around status changes ? Or is pm_runtime already disabled by the time we get here ? > @@ -634,10 +635,10 @@ static int _od_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) > struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > struct omap_device *od = to_omap_device(pdev); > > - if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) && > - !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) { > + if (od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) { > od->flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED; > omap_device_enable(pdev); > + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); ditto, also pm_runtime_set_active() may fail. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature