On 10/10/2013 10:20 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On 10/10/2013 08:32 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On 00:32-20131010, Joel Fernandes wrote: >>> On 10/09/2013 06:24 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>> Call OMAP2+ generic lateinit hook from AM specific late init hook. >>>> This allows the generic late initializations such as cpufreq hooks >>>> to be active. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 1 + >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h | 1 + >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c | 6 ++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c >>>> index 87162e1..b474498 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c >>>> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(AM33XX_DT, "Generic AM33XX (Flattened Device Tree)") >>>> .init_irq = omap_intc_of_init, >>>> .handle_irq = omap3_intc_handle_irq, >>>> .init_machine = omap_generic_init, >>>> + .init_late = am33xx_init_late, >>> >>> Instead of adding a new a *_init_late function for every platform, perhaps >>> better to just do: >>> .init_late = omap2_common_pm_late_init; >>> >>> since that's the only function you're calling. >>> >>> Later if more functions are added, then it can be wrapped around. >> >> And what benefit would that give us? we break consistency of functions >> available in io.c, considering the work we have already done in >> out-of-tree patches on ti-forks, we *do know* that there is more >> incoming and has to be done anyways, I prefer having symmetric >> functions and a placeholder that folks can add on to. >> > > Ok, sure if you think such placeholders are right way and there's more code > later to be added to init_late callbacks. > > Adding 6 lines of identical code for every platform seems redundant, I'd just > define an omap_common_late_init for all platforms for now, and then fork off for > the future differences. That way we save on LOC and readability in the header as > well. Your call. I see a function of that name already exists. I guess you can leave your patch as is then and not have to do this. regards, -Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
