On Wed 2013-09-25 15:33:33, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 19:03:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > &twl->phy.notifier is not initalized > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c index 8f78d2d..efe6155 > > > 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c > > > @@ -705,6 +705,8 @@ static int twl4030_usb_probe(struct > > > platform_device *pdev) if (device_create_file(&pdev->dev, > > > &dev_attr_vbus)) dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "could not create sysfs > > > file\n"); > > > > > > + ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&twl->phy.notifier); > > > + > > > /* Our job is to use irqs and status from the power module > > > * to keep the transceiver disabled when nothing's > > > connected. * > > > > I sent above patch week ago. Did you already included it? > > look at my testing branch. Felipe prefers you to go MAINTAINERS file for git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git entry. After few clicks, you'll find out your two patches in https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/log/?h=testing . So yes, it seems that after 10+ flames Felipe was _not_ lazy to send, "Thanks for a patch" mail was too much work. Apparently, we'll need Documentation/HowToBeGoodMaintainer file... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
