Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >>> It could be as simple as making gas accept an extra argument for >>> instructions like dsb and just ignoring it. >> >> So you prefer I come up with the reversion patches locally and _not_ >> send them upstream? > > This is a silly attitude. What you're effectively saying is that we > are never allowed to use any future ARM instructions in any Linux > kernel because that might break your precious assembler. > > I've got news for you. We're *not* going to listen to that argument. > > END OF DISCUSSION (everything else is just a waste of time.) I fully agree. -- Måns Rullgård mans@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
