Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer >> instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex. > > Meaning I play whack-a-mole as this becomes permission to depend on > endless new gnuisms just because they're there and nobody else is > regression testing against them, not because they actually add anything. Since when is assembling the instructions correctly, as specified in the arch ref, and not in some other random way a gnuism? -- Måns Rullgård mans@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
