Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 09/23/2013 06:59:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >> During 3.12-rc, Will Deacon introduced code into arch/arm that >> requires binutils 2.22. > > Um, my toolchain is using the last gplv2 snapshot of binutils out of > git, which is just past 2.17 and can build armv7 (but not armv8). > > Binutils 2.12->2.22 is quite the jump. (11 years.) I'd except some > thought to have gone into that? Possibly a mention of it? I seriously doubt that 2.12 still works at all (I doubt it can even be built on a modern system). In my experience, binutils older than 2.19 or so rarely works properly for ARM. What value is there in maintaining compatibility with a truly ancient binutils version anyway? -- Måns Rullgård mans@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
