* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [130920 11:32]:
> On Friday 20 September 2013 19:46:41 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> Ok, then there is new patch which only adding omap3-rom-rng and not removing omap_rng.
> It is OK to have same CLK data but with different names?
Yes in this case it's always either omap_rng or omap3-rom-rng
so the patch below looks OK to me.
Regards,
Tony
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> index 334b767..03a2829 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> @@ -3275,6 +3275,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap36xx_clks[] = {
> static struct omap_clk omap34xx_omap36xx_clks[] = {
> CLK(NULL, "aes1_ick", &aes1_ick),
> CLK("omap_rng", "ick", &rng_ick),
> + CLK("omap3-rom-rng", "ick", &rng_ick),
> CLK(NULL, "sha11_ick", &sha11_ick),
> CLK(NULL, "des1_ick", &des1_ick),
> CLK(NULL, "cam_mclk", &cam_mclk),
>
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
