On Friday 30 August 2013 01:44:50 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 29 August 2013 20:24:32 Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Tuesday 27 August 2013 19:18:55 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > >> > The driver should support the same chip models reardless of whether > > >> > it's used with or without DT. If an entry in the OF table has no > > >> > corresponding entry in the I2C table I would consider that as a > > >> > driver > > >> > bug. > > >> > > >> Linus Walleij posted a patch to support DT only probing, but too many > > >> side-effects showed up. Some were fixable (probe regressions) and some > > >> need more work, if feasible at all. Most prominent is that runtime > > >> instantiation of i2c slaves currently needs an entry in the i2c table. > > > > > > Linus, I'd like to get this in v3.12 if it's not too late. Could you > > > please provide your input ? > > > > Provided some input on the v4 version, > > Do you mean v4 of this patch ? I can't find your reply. Scratch that, I've found it. Sorry for the noise. > > due to being a bit overloaded my patch queue is overloaded... > > No worries. We can delay this one until v3.13. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html