On Thursday 29 August 2013 09:44 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 8/29/2013 7:01 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 August 2013 09:26 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On 8/29/2013 4:53 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>>> index 22d9f2b..1ba6a77 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>>> @@ -126,6 +126,11 @@
>>>> pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7fff>;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> + ocmcram: ocmcram@40304000 {
>>>
>>> This can now be changed to 0x40300000 now that you have moved to
>>> gen_pool_alloc()?
>>>
>> NO.
>> It won't work on secure devices since first 16 KB is occupied for
>> default configuration. Its not worth trouble also to handle
>> secure/non-secure considering the use of SRAM which is actually just
>> limited to errata. 40304000 will work for both devices.
>
> Okay, the same problem is not applicable to OMAP5 and other devices? I
> am okay with this as such, may be just add a comment explaining why
> there is an offset.
>
>From specs the errata is applicable only for O4 though OMAP5 downstream
kernel enabled it. Its ok to limit this one for O5 now.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
