Hi Rajendra,
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 05:00 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 07:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>> Reuse OMAP4 operations on AM43x.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ambresh K <ambresh@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> index 7f4db12..a1b7e20 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> @@ -4123,6 +4123,14 @@ void __init omap_hwmod_init(void)
>> soc_ops.init_clkdm = _init_clkdm;
>> soc_ops.update_context_lost = _omap4_update_context_lost;
>> soc_ops.get_context_lost = _omap4_get_context_lost;
>> + } else if (soc_is_am43xx()) {
>> + soc_ops.enable_module = _omap4_enable_module;
>> + soc_ops.disable_module = _omap4_disable_module;
>> + soc_ops.wait_target_ready = _omap4_wait_target_ready;
>> + soc_ops.assert_hardreset = _omap4_assert_hardreset;
>> + soc_ops.deassert_hardreset = _omap4_deassert_hardreset;
>> + soc_ops.is_hardreset_asserted = _omap4_is_hardreset_asserted;
>> + soc_ops.init_clkdm = _init_clkdm;
>
> Did you leave out soc_ops.update_context_lost and soc_ops.get_context_lost on
> purpose?
As far as I understand, primarily driver make use of this with the help
of function pointers passed through platform data. And as am43x is a DT
only platform, it was left out.
Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
