On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 07:28 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 08/14/2013 08:49 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> [Adding Mike Turquette and dt maintainers] > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:39:44PM +0100, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >>> On 08/14/2013 08:20 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday 14 August 2013 06:18 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >>>>> Hi Rajendra, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> [..] > >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > >>>>>> index 12fa589..e5c804b 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > >>>>>> @@ -805,6 +805,65 @@ static int _init_interface_clks(struct omap_hwmod *oh) > >>>>>> return ret; > >>>>>> } > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +static const char **_parse_opt_clks_dt(struct omap_hwmod *oh, > >>>>>> + struct device_node *np, > >>>>>> + int *opt_clks_cnt) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + int i, clks_cnt; > >>>>>> + const char *clk_name; > >>>>>> + const char **opt_clk_names; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + clks_cnt = of_property_count_strings(np, "clock-names"); > >>>>>> + if (!clks_cnt) > >>>>>> + return NULL; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + opt_clk_names = kzalloc(sizeof(char *)*clks_cnt, GFP_KERNEL); > >>>>>> + if (!opt_clk_names) > >>>>>> + return NULL; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < clks_cnt; i++) { > >>>>>> + of_property_read_string_index(np, "clock-names", i, &clk_name); > >>>>>> + if (!strcmp(clk_name, "fck")) > >>>>> > >>>>> Could we instead parse for names that are "optional,role_name" instead > >>>>> of assuming anything other than fck is optional clocks? > >>>> > >>>> you mean look for anything with optional,*? because the role names would change. > >>>> > >>> > >>> yes. the idea being, we now have a meaning to the clock name - there are > >>> two types of clocks here.. functional and optional, we *might* have > >>> facility to add interface clock(we dont know interface clock handling > >>> yet, but something in the future).. we might increase the support for > >>> number of functional clocks.. it might help to keep the format such that > >>> it is a "bit extendable". > >> > >> I completely disagree. The only things that should appear in clock-names > >> are the names of the clock inputs that appear in the manual for the > >> device. The driver should know which ones are optional, as that's a > >> fixed property of the IP and the way the driver uses it. > >> > >> You should not be embedding additional semantics in name properties. > > > > we use an level of abstraction called omap_device and hwmod to allow devices to use a generic pm_runtime. drivers for specific blocks dont normally need to know about the clocks to deal with. This allows maximum reuse consider concept is generic enough. > > They do know about the optional clocks though and request and release them when needed. The need for hwmod to know about optional clocks > (and enable all) arises from the fact that some of these devices need *some* optional clocks for a successful reset. > And given hmwod has no knowledge about which optional ones (if at all) will be needed, it goes ahead and enables all before doing a reset. > This is something done only at init time and *not* something thats done every time the device is enabled by the driver using pm_runtime. To clarify: I was initially confused as to the purpose of the code. I'm not against a one-off clock initialisation to put everything into a sane state. If we can't trust the bootloaders, that seems like a necessary evil. I'll leave Mike to comment on whether and how that should be done. I do not think we should be embedding clock semantics in clock-names. That's not the way the property is intended to be used, it breaks uniformity, and it's an abuse of the system that may come back to bite us later. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html