Re: [PATCHv3 8/9] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: Basic suspend resume support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nishanth,
The issue here is that during a low-power transition the peripheral power domain loses context so the MSTANDBY config gets lost which is why the custom handling is needed on every cycle if there is no driver to handle it. I was unable to come up with a more generic way to handle this but I am certainly open for suggestions.

Regards,
Dave

On 08/07/2013 11:22 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/06/2013 12:49 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
[...]

+
+struct forced_standby_module am33xx_mod[] = {
+    {.oh_name = "usb_otg_hs"},
+    {.oh_name = "tptc0"},
+    {.oh_name = "tptc1"},
+    {.oh_name = "tptc2"},
+    {.oh_name = "cpgmac0"},
+};
+
[...]
+
+static int am33xx_pm_suspend(void)
+{
+    int i, j, ret = 0;
+
+    int status = 0;
+    struct platform_device *pdev;
+    struct omap_device *od;
+
+    /*
+     * By default the following IPs do not have MSTANDBY asserted
+     * which is necessary for PER domain transition. If the drivers
+     * are not compiled into the kernel HWMOD code will not change the
+     * state of the IPs if the IP was not never enabled. To ensure
+     * that there no issues with or without the drivers being compiled
+     * in the kernel, we forcefully put these IPs to idle.
+     */
+    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(am33xx_mod); i++) {
+        pdev = to_platform_device(am33xx_mod[i].dev);
+        od = to_omap_device(pdev);
+        if (od->_driver_status != BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER) {
+            omap_device_enable_hwmods(od);
+            omap_device_idle_hwmods(od);
+        }
+    }

Sorry, I dont like this one bit. this is the job of the suspend / resume
handler dealing with the specific device. I recollect having a similar
issue on OMAP5 where without USB driver, USB wont idle, hence we cant
suspend either. is the solution to do a custom handling for specific
nodes as above? is it even necessary - considering that in multiple
suspend-resume iterations, do we need to "enable and idle" multiple
times? Cant we do it just in hwmod/omap_device level where unbound
devices are disabled? Is there absolutely no possible way to do this in
a generic manner?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux