Hi, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:45:23PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > one more thing, why do you consider a new revision to be an error ? > > Okay, so why don't you go and remove the version checking code > altogether? if you need to treak certain aspects of the IP differently, you need the revision check, don't be so childish. what I'm saying is that we can give new IP revision a chance to work if they have no programming model differences (except for, perhaps, new features and different erratas). On dwc3 (drivers/usb/dwc3) we support every single revision of the IP. We only have revision checks to enable (or not) known silicon erratas. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
