On 07/30/2013 11:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/23/2013 02:20 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:OMAP3 gate clocks are handled through the clk driver now. Basic gate clock can't be used as the OMAP3 gate clocks have some special features, namely the idle status linkage which is on separate register. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> --- drivers/clk/omap/gate.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/omap/gate.c b/drivers/clk/omap/gate.c index 7186bb2..b560ff4 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/omap/gate.c +++ b/drivers/clk/omap/gate.c @@ -28,12 +28,19 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_OF -static const struct clk_ops omap_gate_clk_ops = { +static const struct clk_ops omap_gate_clkdm_clk_ops = { .init = &omap2_init_clk_clkdm, .enable = &omap2_clkops_enable_clkdm, .disable = &omap2_clkops_disable_clkdm, }; +static const struct clk_ops omap_gate_clk_ops = { + .init = &omap2_init_clk_clkdm, + .enable = &omap2_dflt_clk_enable, + .disable = &omap2_dflt_clk_disable, + .is_enabled = &omap2_dflt_clk_is_enabled, +}; + void __init of_omap_gate_clk_setup(struct device_node *node) { struct clk *clk; @@ -43,6 +50,7 @@ void __init of_omap_gate_clk_setup(struct device_node *node) int num_parents; const char **parent_names; int i; + u32 val; clk_hw = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_hw_omap), GFP_KERNEL); if (!clk_hw) { @@ -56,7 +64,22 @@ void __init of_omap_gate_clk_setup(struct device_node *node) of_property_read_string(node, "ti,clkdm-name", &clk_hw->clkdm_name); init.name = clk_name; - init.ops = &omap_gate_clk_ops; + init.flags = 0; + + if (of_property_read_u32_index(node, "reg", 0, &val)) { + /* No register, clkdm control only */ + init.ops = &omap_gate_clkdm_clk_ops; + } else { + init.ops = &omap_gate_clk_ops; + clk_hw->enable_reg = of_iomap(node, 0); + of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,enable-bit", &val); + clk_hw->enable_bit = val; + + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,dss-clk")) + clk_hw->ops = &clkhwops_omap3430es2_dss_usbhost_wait;umm, it was going relatively ok so far, till i hit this :( it is probably a quirk... but still..
Some of the clocks need special hwops for them to work properly it seems... It looks nasty yea but the best I could think of.
+ else + clk_hw->ops = &clkhwops_wait; + } num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node); if (num_parents < 1) {but still no usage of "ti,omap-gate-clock" makes me question the need for this file.
Yea, no ti,omap-gate-clock, but there is ti,gate-clock. Just look harder. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
