On 29/07/2013, at 13:43, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I guess the safer approach is to just revert these since they are causing >> a regression and what the patches aims to fix as been broken since the >> initial OMAP migration to DT anyways. > > I have already reverted these and pushed to linux-next. > Thanks for doing that and sorry for all the inconvenience. Too bad this regression was not found before the patches hit mainline and they even were on linux-next for some time but shit happens :-( > Actually input-hogs was not such a good idea either, after > meditating on this I realized that the information about what > GPIOs are used as interrupts is a piece of information that > already exist in the device tree, albeit a bit distributed. > > So I'm drafting an RFC to indicate how I think this should > be solved. > Great, I hope we can finally have a good solution for this long standing issue. > Yours, > Linus Walleij Best regards, Javier-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
