Hi Sergei,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 07/19/2013 07:40 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>>>> GPADC is the general purpose ADC present on twl6030.
>>>> The dt data is interrupt used to trigger end of ADC
>>>> conversion.
>
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@xxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>>> index 2e3bd31..d7d4c28 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>>> @@ -103,4 +103,10 @@
>>>> compatible = "ti,twl6030-pwmled";
>>>> #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> + adc: gpadc {
>
>
>>> Read my lips: the node should be called just "adc", not "gpadc".
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Are you sure?
>
>
> I didn't know how to express my disappointment from Oleksandr's inability
> to understand what I wanted to convey to him from 2 attempts... first,
How would you comment the following code, v3.10-rc7:
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi, line 375
375 ab8500-gpadc {
376 compatible =
"stericsson,ab8500-gpadc";
377 interrupts = <32
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi: ab8500-gpadc {
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi:
compatible = "stericsson,ab8500-gpadc";
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi:
vddadc-supply = <&ab8500_ldo_tvout_reg>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi: tsadcc: tsadcc@f8018000 {
arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi: compatible =
"atmel,at91sam9x5-tsadcc";
arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi:
atmel,tsadcc_clock = <300000>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi: tscadc: tscadc@44e0d000 {
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi: compatible = "ti,am3359-tscadc";
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi: ti,hwmods = "adc_tsc";
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi: am335x_adc: adc {
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi: compatible =
"ti,am3359-adc";
Regards,
Sasha.
> changed the label instead of the node name, then he only dropped "twl6030_"
> prefix from the name. I should probably have been even more specific before.
>
>
>> Why? The name was selected according to the documentation on device
>> "General
>> purpose analog-to-digital converter (GPADC)".
>
>
> Sigh, we simply don't care whether this ADC is general-purpose or not.
> The main thing it is ADC.
>
>
>> PS. Following your logic - "GPIO" need to renamed to "IO" everywhere ;P
>
>
> GPIO is well known and established abbreviation, contrasted to GPADC.
> Moreover, ePAPR spec lists "gpio" as a generic node name.
>
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
