Hello Lars, On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> +static int twl6032_calibration(struct twl6030_gpadc_data *gpadc) >> +{ >> + int chn, d1 = 0, d2 = 0, temp; >> + u8 trim_regs[17]; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = twl_i2c_read(TWL6030_MODULE_ID2, trim_regs + 1, >> + TWL6030_GPADC_TRIM1, 16); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(gpadc->dev, "calibration failed\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Loop to calculate the value needed for returning voltages from >> + * GPADC not values. >> + * >> + * gain is calculated to 3 decimal places fixed point. >> + */ >> + for (chn = 0; chn < TWL6032_GPADC_MAX_CHANNELS; chn++) { >> + >> + switch (chn) { >> + case 0: >> + case 1: >> + case 2: >> + case 3: >> + case 4: >> + case 5: >> + case 6: >> + case 11: >> + case 12: >> + case 13: >> + case 14: >> + /* D1 */ >> + d1 = (trim_regs[3] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + d1 |= (trim_regs[1] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[1] & 0x01) >> + d1 = -d1; >> + >> + /* D2 */ >> + d2 = (trim_regs[4] & 0x3F) << 2; >> + d2 |= (trim_regs[2] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[2] & 0x01) >> + d2 = -d2; >> + break; >> + case 8: >> + /* D1 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[3] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[1] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[1] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d1 = (trim_regs[8] & 0x18) << 1; >> + d1 |= (trim_regs[7] & 0x1E) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[7] & 0x01) >> + d1 = -d1; >> + >> + d1 += temp; >> + >> + /* D2 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[4] & 0x3F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[2] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[2] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d2 = (trim_regs[10] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + d2 |= (trim_regs[8] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[8] & 0x01) >> + d2 = -d2; >> + >> + d2 += temp; >> + break; >> + case 9: >> + /* D1 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[3] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[1] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[1] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d1 = (trim_regs[14] & 0x18) << 1; >> + d1 |= (trim_regs[12] & 0x1E) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[12] & 0x01) >> + d1 = -d1; >> + >> + d1 += temp; >> + >> + /* D2 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[4] & 0x3F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[2] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[2] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d2 = (trim_regs[16] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + d2 |= (trim_regs[14] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[14] & 0x01) >> + d2 = -d2; >> + >> + d2 += temp; >> + case 10: >> + /* D1 */ >> + d1 = (trim_regs[11] & 0x0F) << 3; >> + d1 |= (trim_regs[9] & 0x0E) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[9] & 0x01) >> + d1 = -d1; >> + >> + /* D2 */ >> + d2 = (trim_regs[15] & 0x0F) << 3; >> + d2 |= (trim_regs[13] & 0x0E) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[13] & 0x01) >> + d2 = -d2; >> + break; >> + case 7: >> + case 18: >> + /* D1 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[3] & 0x1F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[1] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[1] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d1 = (trim_regs[5] & 0x7E) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[5] & 0x01) >> + d1 = -d1; >> +. >> + d1 += temp; >> + >> + /* D2 */ >> + temp = (trim_regs[4] & 0x3F) << 2; >> + temp |= (trim_regs[2] & 0x06) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[2] & 0x01) >> + temp = -temp; >> + >> + d2 = (trim_regs[6] & 0xFE) >> 1; >> + if (trim_regs[6] & 0x01) >> + d2 = -d2; >> + >> + d2 += temp; >> + break; > > > There is quite a bit of copy paste in here. Putting the bit swizziling into > a helper function should also improbe legibility. Trimming bits are scattered randomly between registers and in different bit positions. I don't see any commonalities, that could be generalized. as Graeme said about it "it's a bane of my life". Regards, OK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html