Hi, On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:06:37AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx> wrote: > > What is the status of this patch? We're already at 3.10-rc7 and GPIO > > IRQs are still broken on OMAP1. [...] > There is a problem with this patch. [...] > So I think that the correct solution is to add SPARSE_IRQ support to > omap1 and not reverting Jon's patch. Of course this may not be > possible since we are so close to 3.10 and most OMAP patches already > merged for 3.11 but we should definitely try to have this at least for > 3.12. Otherwise we won't be able to move to DT-only booting for > OMAP2+. OMAP1 does not use DT. So we could put this code under #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1 or similar. It's just a few lines of code. OMAP2+ work should not regress OMAP1. Demanding SPARSE_IRQ support for OMAP1 should have been discussed before these changes were made. It's not reasonable to assume such things can be made during rc-cycle. Also, now, I don't think it's reasonable to wait for that to be done, as it would take until 3.12 or even later to get OMAP1 functional again. A. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
