On Friday 21 June 2013, Anna, Suman wrote: > Yes, we still have a plan for a generic subsystem, and these would form the > the base patches of OMAP adaptation towards that. OMAP mailbox was disabled > since couple of releases now because of the multi-platform enablement. There were > couple of different work-items needed on OMAP mailbox like fixing the multi-platform, > converting to DT and adapting to the new framework. The previous subsystem was > derived of the OMAP mailbox, so the first and last items were kinda automatic. The > newest one based on Jassi's work is not gonna reuse any OMAP stuff, so this series > handles the first one to avoid a huge pending patchset for OMAP on the generic > framework finalization. Ok, thanks for the explanation. Please also see the other email thread about the linux-next conflict. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
