Re: [PATCH 2/5] i2c: omap: add runtime check in isr to be sure that i2c is enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Felipe,
On 06/07/2013 10:02 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:46:05PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Add runtime check at the beginning of omap_i2c_isr/omap_i2c_isr_thread
to be sure that i2c is enabled, before performing IRQ handling and accessing
I2C IP registers:
	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev->dev)) {
		WARN_ONCE(true, "We should never be here!\n");
		return IRQ_NONE;
	}

Produce warning in case if ISR called when i2c is disabled

CC: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |   10 ++++++++++
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 97844ff..2dac598 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -885,6 +885,11 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
  	u16 stat;
spin_lock(&dev->lock);
+	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev->dev)) {
+		WARN_ONCE(true, "We should never be here!\n");
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
returning IRQ_NONE is not what you want to do in this case. You want to
setup a flag so that your runtime_resume() knows that there are pending
events to be handled and you handle those in runtime_resume time.
I don't want to handle this IRQ - we should never be here.
Will be changed to  IRQ_HANDLED.

But to be frank, I don't see how this can trigger since we're calling
pm_runtime_get_sync() from omap_i2c_xfer() which means by the time
pm_runtime_get_sync() returns, assuming no errors, i2c module should be
fully resumed and ready to go. Perhaps you have found a bug somewhere
else ?
May be it's better to revert this patch:
e3a36b207f76364c281aeecaf14c1b22a7247278
i2c: omap: remove unnecessary pm_runtime_suspended check

which doesn't cover case when transfer is *finished*.
Please, see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2689211/ and
cover-latter.

Also, your 'We should never be here' message isn't helpfull at all.

@@ -905,6 +910,11 @@ omap_i2c_isr_thread(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
  	u16 stat;
  	int err = 0, count = 0;
+ if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev->dev)) {
+		WARN_ONCE(true, "We should never be here!\n");
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
because of IRQF_ONESHOT I can't see how this would *ever* be a valid
check.

Please, see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2689211/ and
cover-latter.

Sorry, for delayed reply - I've had problems with my e-mail.

- grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux