Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxx> writes: [...] >>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bour <v-bour@xxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Affortunati <l-affortunati@xxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrii.Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxx> >> From Documentation/SubbmittingPatches: >> >> "If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling >> of a patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then >> they can arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's >> changelog." >> >> Are all of the tags above co-authors or on the delivery path? I suspect >> an Acked-by or Reviewed-by is more appropriate here. [...] > This patch was developed by Nishanth, he is the author of the code. > Patch is the result of 2-week debug session. Vincent, Leonardo and > Nishanth were involved to that debug session. > My contribution to this patch - is sending it to upstream, no more > than this. > Could you please suggest - who should remain in Signed-offs ? Nishanth as the author, and you since you're on the delivery path. If Vincent & Leonardo should be considered as co-authors, then their signoffs are fine, otherwise they should be reviewed-by or acked-by. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
