Re: [PATCH 1/1] USB: ehci-omap: Reset dma_mask pointer on probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 May 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:

> Device tree probed devices don't get dma_mask set. Previously
> we were setting the dma_mask pointer only if it was NULL.
> However, the address of 'omap_ehci_dma_mask' would change
> each time the module is unloaded and loaded back thus causing
> the devices dma_mask pointer to be invalid on the next load.
> 
> This will cause page faults if any driver tries to access the
> old dma_mask pointer.
> 
> Unconditionally re-setting the dma_mask pointer fixes this problem.

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> index 3d1491b..b33e306 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> @@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * Since shared usb code relies on it, set it here for now.
>  	 * Once we have dma capability bindings this can go away.
>  	 */
> -	if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
> -		pdev->dev.dma_mask = &omap_ehci_dma_mask;
> +	pdev->dev.dma_mask = &omap_ehci_dma_mask;

Is this the solution that people have agreed on?  There has been a lot 
of discussion on this topic.  In particular, there has been talk about 
fixing it in the DT core.

This particular approach doesn't seem very robust.  What if 
pdev->dev.dma_mask is already set to a different value for some good 
reason?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux