* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [130426 10:44]: > Hi, > It seems that I have not been paying close attention to > actual voltage value seen on scope to map it back to verify the validity > of the voltage value. Even though I did verify[1] that voltage did scale to > values in DT entries, the values in the case of 3630 and 4460 were lower than > what the spec voltage was as per opp_data files. > > This series is based off Benoit's tree here: > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git/log/?h=for_3.10/dts > > Commit ID's in the patches to indicate regressions are from there as well. > Would be good to have this fix merged to 3.10 dts entries. > I have cross verified that OMAP3430,3630,4430 and 4460 entries now match that > of corresponding opp*_data.c > > My sincere apologies on the oversight. > > Nishanth Menon (2): > ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: Fix CPU OPP voltages > ARM: dts: OMAP4460: Fix CPU OPP voltages > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 6 +++--- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136580742724210&w=2 Thanks applying both into omap-for-v3.10/dt-fixes. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
