On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:51:53PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130508 12:29]: > > > > Current Problem: > > > > There are several gaps in my understanding of how far along TI's conversion to > > DT is. Should I be doing a separate board file for initializing the legacy > > items? I was hoping to do it all with DT. > > Sorry forgot to reply to this.. No seprate board file should be needed, > some devices may still need to be initialized with pdata based on the > compatible flag. ti,hwmod, right? > > Obviously, I don't expect anybody to run out and buy one of these, take it > > apart, and try to boot this code. But if the omap guys could take a look at > > this and give me a few pointers, I'd appreciate it. I'm kind of spinning my > > wheels at the moment. > > > > Primarily, I'd like to get nand and usb working, so that I can read/write, > > mount a rootfs and do better testing. > > The USB should be doable with device tree. At least both echi and > musb are working properly on pandaboard. I think people have been > using NAND with the gpmc DT patches, but I don't know the current > status for sure. I'll try your suggestion in your other email for ToT and see if I can get gpmc going. > Is the hard drive on the EHCI bus or how is it connected to omap? via ehci. They brutalized the tps driver to detect if the goflex cable was attached or not. Once I get something stable, I'll probably write a separate driver for that code. Or, push it out to userspace. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
