Hi Jonathan, On May 6, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 05/06/2013 01:48 PM, Jan Luebbe wrote: >> Hi Pantelis, >> >> while trying out your patch on a custom AM335x board, I noticed that the >> sysfs entries ware missing. This is fixed in the first patch, you might want >> to squash that into your original patch. >> >> The second one makes sure that the iio framework does not read invalid data. >> >> Regards, >> Jan > > I don't believe Pantelis ever came back with a response to the various issues > raised with the original patches? > I am aware. We've been quite busy getting the new beaglebone out. I plan to revisit the full patchset for all the various fixes we had to do in a month or so. > If Pantelis has moved on, Jan feel free to pick up the patches, respin them > and resend to linux-iio if you like (with appropriate crediting naturally) > I wouldn't mind Jan to pick up the IIO patches. > Until these are appropriately fixed up and resent, I'm lazy so will ignore these. > (your patches look reasonable to me based on a really superficial look) > > Jonathan Regards -- Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
