Andreas Fenkart <andreas.fenkart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > When a gpio interrupt is masked, the gpio event will still be latched in > the interrupt status register so when you unmask it later you may get an > interrupt straight away. However, if the interrupt is disabled then gpio > events occurring will not be latched/stored. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <andreas.fenkart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The approach seems OK to me, but the changelog is still missing quite a bit of information. I know it's been hashed over in the various threads, but the changelog needs all that discussion summarized. The changelog should at least: - describe the problem/bug being fixed - describe the fix - answer "why" the approach was taken (not how.) This part is very important to reviewers and maintainers. - how it was tested, and on what platforms In addition, I'd like to see a description of how (or whether) this affects the genirq lazy disable functionality, and how it was tested. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
