Hi, On 04/22/2013 04:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Is it possible to handle ABE no_idle_on_suspend uscase the way I am >> trying to handle it for UART in the 2nd patch of this series? > > let's ask Péter. > > Péter, OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND should be removed as driver's can > get same behavior by just returning -EBUSY from their ->runtime_suspend > callbacks. Do you see any problems with patch below (left for > reference) ? Would it be too difficult to add > ->runtime_suspend/->runtime_resume on ASoC layer ? I don't see any issue with this. FWIW AESS/ABE does not use the OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND flag neither in upstream nor in my development branch. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
