On 04/17/2013 08:42 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 04/17/2013 02:55 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> There are so many patches flying around in this thread that I missed it :-) >>> >>> Sorry about that... >> >> No problem. >> >>>> I was trying to see if we could find a common solution that everyone >>>> could use as it seems that ideally we should all be requesting the gpio. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136606204823845&w=1 >>> >>> btw, I shared the latest patch with only build testing it, but today I >>> gave a try and I found a problem with this approach. The .xlate >>> function is being called twice for each GPIO-IRQ so the first time >>> gpio_request_one() succeeds but the second time it fails returning >>> -EBUSY. >> >> I tried it and I did not see that. I don't see the below warning either. >> > > weird, I wonder what's different here. I am testing on an omap4-sdp which uses a spi based ethernet device. However, I could try with the omap3430-sdp which uses gpmc. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
