Re: gpio/omap v2: map irq_enable/disable to mask/unmask.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/11/2013 10:54 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 11 April 2013 06:48 PM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
>> I submitted the following patch a while back.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1886421/
>>
>> As already said, the patch is straight forward, but without it,
>> we probably will not see decent SDIO performance on am335x chips.
>>
>> [why it is needed]
>>
> Why part is clear for me.
> 
>> There are still open questions to gpio patch itself, see here
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg87217.html
>>
>> So could we pls reopen that thread? It might be on the other side
>> of your mailbox
>>
> Your idea is reasonable and probably patch make lot of sense for
> edge triggered interrupt.
> 
> Can you please repost the patch with the more comprehensive change-log
> as discussed in the thread.

Originally, I had a question on enable/disable versus mask/unmask, but
looking at the way we have implemented mask/unmask for omap, I don't
think that my question is really applicable. Yes so please re-post.

Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux