On 04/11/2013 10:54 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2013 06:48 PM, Andreas Fenkart wrote: >> Hi Santosh, >> >> I submitted the following patch a while back. >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1886421/ >> >> As already said, the patch is straight forward, but without it, >> we probably will not see decent SDIO performance on am335x chips. >> >> [why it is needed] >> > Why part is clear for me. > >> There are still open questions to gpio patch itself, see here >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg87217.html >> >> So could we pls reopen that thread? It might be on the other side >> of your mailbox >> > Your idea is reasonable and probably patch make lot of sense for > edge triggered interrupt. > > Can you please repost the patch with the more comprehensive change-log > as discussed in the thread. Originally, I had a question on enable/disable versus mask/unmask, but looking at the way we have implemented mask/unmask for omap, I don't think that my question is really applicable. Yes so please re-post. Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
