Hi Sakari, On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:46:01 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 07 March 2013 23:18:27 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:44:41PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:20:16PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday 06 March 2013 21:12:06 Pali Rohár wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday 17 February 2013 20:03:03 Aaro Koskinen wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:16:49PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > >>>>>>> +/* > >>>>>>> + * arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-camera.c > >>>>>>> + * > >>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Nokia Corporation > >>>>>>> + * > >>>>>>> + * Contact: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> + * Tuukka Toivonen <tuukka.o.toivonen@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You should put these people to CC... Just to see if the addresses are > >>>>>> still valid (which I doubt). > >>>>> > >>>>> Ok, trying :-) > >>>> > >>>> I got "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)" for both addresses. > >> > >> This is expected. > >> > >>> Sakari Ailus hosts some code on github [0], which has the following > >>> email address: > >>> sakari.ailus+gitorious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> > >>> I added it to this mail's CC. > >>> > >>> [0] https://gitorious.org/~sailus > >> > >> Nice to hear people are interested in this. ;-) > >> > >> The primary reason I haven't tried submitting this to mainline is that > >> ARM board code has a bad reputation these days. The N900 does not have > >> yet support for device tree (AFAIK), which also would require a few bits > >> and pieces on the flash driver to work. > >> > >> Also the sensor and lens drivers would need at least some work before > >> being ready for submission to mainline for camera to be usable. > >> Unfortunately I haven't had recently time to work on this. N9(50) support > >> has higher priority for myself. That, too, is pending the DT support for > >> the device. > >> > >> There's indeed more up-to-date code in my repository. Even if it's not > >> too close to mainline anymore it should be a better starting point than > >> the old kernel from MeeGo. > >> > >> <URL:https://gitorious.org/omap3camera/pages/Home> > > > > Hi, > > > > this board code is same in your git repository and on meego obs. > > > > Patch only adding support for adp1653 driver which is already in upstream > > kernel. > > > > Are there any other problems with this patch to go for upstream? > > A few more things comes to mind. We depend a little bit on actual board > code; it's not only static data. That's the configuration of the external > clock from the ISP to the sensor. That should move to the common clock > framework so that the ISP registers the clock and the sensor driver can then > use it. AFAIR Laurent has done some work on that. Yes. I hope to get the patches in v3.10. > The peculiar detail of the rx51 is that there's a switch on the camera CCP2 > bus that selects either sensor (primary or secondary). Both sensors are > connected to the same receiver. That isn't properly modelled currently at > all, so that's why we have rx51_camera_set_xshutdown(). I guess it'd still > work if you only power (i.e. open) either of the devices at a time, though. Have you thought about how we could model that ? > That should be all. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
