On 15:24-20130312, Benoit Cousson wrote: > Hi Guys, > > On 03/12/2013 06:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT > >> is not complete. In short, the ability to: > >> cpus { > >> cpu@0 { > >> clocks = <&cpuclk 0>; > >> }; > >> }; > >> is not possible. However, the clock node is registered. > >> Allow for clk names to be provided as string so as to be used when needed. > >> Example (for OMAP3630): > >> cpus { > >> cpu@0 { > >> clock-name = "cpufreq_ck"; > >> }; > >> }; > >> > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > >> --- > > Seems a reasonable to me. > > No, it is not... > > You cannot add a temp binding just because the OMAP support is not > there, since the real binding already exist. > > You need to register properly a clock provider to be able to reference > it. > If you do need a hacky temp code you could do it in OMAP code but not in > the binding. OK. My intent is to remove omap-cpufreq.c. So, I guess I could do something like the following (not tested yet), but would that be the right approach? diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c index 0f0a97c..c3017deb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2420_clks[] = { CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &func_32k_ck, CK_242X), CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_242X), CLK(NULL, "timer_ext_ck", &alt_ck, CK_242X), - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &virt_prcm_set, CK_242X), + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &virt_prcm_set, CK_242X), }; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c index aed8f74..7000ca4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c @@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2430_clks[] = { CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &func_32k_ck, CK_243X), CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_243X), CLK(NULL, "timer_ext_ck", &alt_ck, CK_243X), - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &virt_prcm_set, CK_243X), + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &virt_prcm_set, CK_243X), }; static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c index 4579c3c..7a1dfde 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c @@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = { CLK(NULL, "uart4_ick", &uart4_ick_am35xx, CK_AM35XX), CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &omap_32k_fck, CK_3XXX), CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_3XXX), - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &dpll1_ck, CK_3XXX), + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &dpll1_ck, CK_3XXX), }; static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c index 3d58f33..5fad1da 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c @@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { CLK("4013a000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, CK_443X), CLK("4013c000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, CK_443X), CLK("4013e000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, CK_443X), - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &dpll_mpu_ck, CK_443X), + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &dpll_mpu_ck, CK_443X), }; int __init omap4xxx_clk_init(void) -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html