On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:58:29AM +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote: > This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase > readability. > > Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 4 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/fb.c | 5 +---- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c | 5 +---- > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > index 1ec7f05..2a0816e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int __init omap3_l3_init(void) > > WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); > > - return IS_ERR(pdev) ? PTR_ERR(pdev) : 0; > + return PTR_RET(pdev); This is incorrect. The return value will be tested for < 0. Kernel pointers in general are all above 3GB, and so are all "< 0". I'm afraid none of these changes stuff is an improvement - they all introduce bugs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
